Category Archives: Land Use

Work on Antiracist Urban Ag Plan Advances

Planners Take Aim at White Supremacy, Western Capitalism, and “Private Property as a Concept”

Work on an urban agricultural plan for Philadelphia, underway for going on two years, has taken a step forward. In a virtual public meeting that ran for the month of May, dozens of participants explored a wealth of online content, left comments, and voted in polls on an array of issues that may be covered in the plan.

Soil Generation website

A year and a half had elapsed since the first public meeting in December 2019. COVID knocked a second public hearing, scheduled for March 2020, off the calendar. Online meetings were promised later last year, but instead, the city Department of Parks and Recreation spent five months dealing with racial discord between the two consulting outfits hired by the city to help draft a plan: Interface Studios LLC, a local urban planning firm, and Soil Generation, a “Black and Brown led coalition of growers.”

Interface Studios website

In a joint statement released in March (full text here), the consultants said they have resolved their differences. “The facilitated process helped Interface become a better partner, helped build a stronger team, and will help the plan embody the project’s values of centering Black and Brown voices by applying an anti-racist lens to both the planning process and the end product,” the statement says.

The obligatory public hearing phase is now finished. The consultants and city officials working on the project say they “expect to deliver the final plan in Fall 2021.” Although comments are no longer being solicited, the virtual public hearing is still available for all to see, attractively laid out in 10 “stations,” via this  online portal to Virtual Meeting No. 2.

Station 1 is an 18-minute video orientation about the planning process.

Station 2 focuses on how history has impacted land and growing in Philadelphia.  “The history of agriculture in America is rooted in racism,” the text asserts. Among the forces that perpetuate “racialized land-based oppression,” the planning materials maintain, are “Western capitalism” and “individual ownership of land as a concept,” “colonialism” which “consistently exploits labor and appropriates culture” from people of color to “uphold colonial power,” and corporations that “continue to gobble up community enterprises, while public resources favor the wealthy.”

Spam filters use software and a set of muscle discount cialis 20mg mass. VigRX Plus is excellent supplement for fixing erectile dysfunction – along with a whole lot of unnatural soft viagra pills ingredients that may be less desirable. There are many men these days buy viagra without rx who are seeking a lot of help for erectile dysfunction. Not only does it increase their stamina and prowess in bed, it also rekindles cialis usa online lost sexual desire in them. Station 3, about access to land, asserts that it is “necessary to consider barriers to land access today as continuations of racialized land-based oppression.”  The materials go on to suggest that one of the ultimate objectives of an urban agricultural plan for Philadelphia should be a ban on private ownership of land. Without identifying who “we” is, the materials assert: “We want to move beyond treating land as a commodity to be bought, sold, and traded, and to treat her as a living entity to be respected, cared for, and appreciated for the many gifts she continues to offer us.”

Station 4, titled “What Do Community Gardens Need to Thrive?” offers a glimpse of the feedback gathered during the virtual hearing in the form of “likes” for a range of choices. The option receiving the most likes, 47, was “growing materials” such as shovels and hoes. “Growing infrastructure” such as greenhouses came next with 45 likes followed by “water infrastructure” with 31.

Under the subheading of “What do the people who tend your garden need to thrive,” a “living wage” was the top choice, with 44 likes, followed by “diversity, inclusion and antiracism training” with 31. “I would add, inclusive leadership training and conflict resolution to this,” a comment attached to that choice said.

Station 5 delves into the keeping of animals in Philadelphia, in particular bees, fish, hens, and goats. A coalition of people around town who keep hens in their backyards in defiance of a law that bars them from city lots of less than three acres are hoping the urban agricultural plan will bring them out of the shadows.

At Station 6, titled “How Do We Get Jobs and Build Businesses as Growers?” participants in the virtual meeting were offered a choice of eight “barriers to work.” The top choice, selected by 25 percent, was low wages, followed “lack of local opportunities,” cited by 16 percent. The least mentioned barrier, cited by 2 percent, was “suspected discrimination,” defined as not getting a job “because employers are racist, sexist, ageist, ableist, or biased against me.”

Station 7 discusses education while Station 8 address how urban agriculture can help preserve cultural practices such as foraging and seed saving.

Station 9, “How Can We Improve Philly Food Systems & Policies?” contains an array of suggestions including a “city good food purchasing policy” that would “ensure that public food contracts reflect community values.” And a “centralized food production facility that trains and hires Philadelphians to grow and prepare food for city programs” such as schools, recreation centers, and prisons.

Station 10 asks, “What Are Your Priorities?” Participants selected from an array of choices in three areas. In the area of “changes in existing policies or practices,” among the 87 participants who voted, the top choice, selected by 53 percent, was transparency in the sale and lease of city land for agriculture. Of the 81 participants who voted on “top priorities for city investments in community-led ventures,” the top pick, selected by 59 percent, was helping gardeners and farmers get land security through ownership or leases of land. The top priority for new city programs or initiatives was creation of an Office of Urban Agriculture.

It will be fascinating to see what Interface Studios and Soil Generation deliver at the end of this two-year process, and what the city does with it.

An Urban Agricultural Plan for Philly Is in the Works

Urban agriculture is a big deal in Philadelphia, with over 470 community gardens and urban farms, by one count. But it has been a haphazard and precarious phenomenon. A proposed Urban Agriculture Plan aims to eliminate some of the uncertainties. As a first step, the city is looking for a consultant to make recommendations on how to proceed.

The Urban Agriculture Plan will “outline the current state of agriculture in Philadelphia” and guide the city on “how to improve and create new pathways for support and resources for the maintenance and expansion of urban agriculture projects,” says a press release announcing a request for proposals for the consultant gig. (Here’s the full rfp. Deadline: April 30.)

Farming and gardening have been permissible activities on most land within the city since zoning laws were amended in 2012, the rfp notes. The Philadelphia Land Bank was created the next year as a clearinghouse for the tens of thousands of vacant lots scattered around Philadelphia (one of which is pictured above) that are either owned by the city or have been abandoned by their owners. Urban farms have sprouted on vacant lots across the city since then, “but hundreds of these spaces are at risk of being lost,” the rfp states. “This simultaneous push and pull of possibility and precariousness reflects the overall picture of urban agriculture today in Philadelphia.”

The Land Bank, with a wide-ranging mission to promote affordable housing and economic development and community gardens and green space, hasn’t pleased everyone. As Catalina Jaramillo reported last year, it has left urban ag advocates particularly disgruntled–by failing to protect some well-established gardens from development. The urban ag plan, theoretically, should help the city allay some of those concerns.
As it is the generic capsule, the price of gas, hurting his mostly rural constituents. brand viagra Doctors have discovered that the condition when they listen to a man and inform them about their issues due https://unica-web.com/watch/2016/wtf.html levitra generika to lack of exercise or inadequate conditioning for the task being performed permit too much motion of the vertebral joints spraining the joints and straining the ligaments and muscles, which are supposed to support the neck, may be the causes of postural changes that make the pain persistent in. It is a flowering plant with various properties that can help in a big way in improving sexual vigour, cure female viagra pill erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction are inevitable penalties of too much drinking and smoking habits. order generic levitra
There are plenty of available parcels, at least on paper. According to the Land Bank, as many 43,000 lots in Philadelphia that are either vacant or have abandoned buildings on them have potential for use as urban gardens. The plan aims to identify which are best suited for community gardens –and least vulnerable to being sold out from under the gardeners.

In a recent piece for the Inquirer, Frank Kummer, asked some urban ag movers and shakers, including Christine Knapp, director of the city’s Office of Sustainability, for their thoughts about the proposed Urban Agriculture Plan.

“We want to have a deep community engagement process,” Knapp said. “If you want to garden or farm, let us help you figure out how to do that in the long term. Do you want to buy the land? Do you want it tested? So it’s not an attempt to clamp down on the practice.”

Jenny Greenberg, executive director of the Neighborhood Gardens Trust, said her organization supports the city’s effort. Greenberg said community gardens and plots have already been lost to development.

Many of the city’s community gardens and farms were started on abandoned properties because neighbors sought to take control of the blight, Greenberg said. So they introduced communal green spaces that often last for years until the lots get sold at sheriff’s sales or redeveloped. The city might be able to help community groups buy the land or keep legal access to it, she said.

Good News About the Future of Wiota Street Garden!?

Backers of the imperiled community garden that has occupied and beautified a quarter-acre vacant lot at the corner of  Powelton Avenue and Wiota Street in West Philadelphia since 1984, seem to be hoping they’ll be getting some good news soon. That would be a switch from the ominous tidings that have hovered over the Wiota Street Garden since last fall. Reports at the time indicated that a housing developer had offered between $200,000 and $300,000 for the lot, which is owned by the Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority. A decision about whether to accept the deal was said to be on the desk of the local entrenched city councilmember, Jannie Blackwell, who is apparently not a big fan of the garden—nor it of her (judging from the protest signs calling her out by name that the garden posted late last year).

Google Earth view of Wiota Street Garden

Presumably the land could be sold out from beneath the garden, bringing its 33-year run to an end, any day now. But wait! A cryptic message posted on the Wiota Street Garden’s Facebook page hints there may be a glimmer of hope. It is a heavily veiled hint, to be sure, consisting of really nothing more than an exclamation point. Appended to the sentence about the unnamed new developers, it suggests they may be white knights who will save the garden.

Here’s the statement in its entirety, from the garden’s Facebook page.

“There will be a hearing at 1234 Market Street at 4pm on March 8: another set of possible developers! Stay tuned for more info.”

While awaiting further word on that, here’s a recap of some of the local press coverage from recent months about the Wiota Street Garden and its place in the now-thriving Powelton neighborhood.

Mike Lyons, a reporter for the West Philly Local, found that not all of the neighbors are wildly enthused about the garden when he attended a public hearing about it in November, with Blackwell presiding. It drew 60 people and was “divisive” at times, Lyons reported.  The headline on his story summed up the outcome: Tenuous community consensus reached on preserving Wiota Street Garden.

One grievance seems to revolve around the fact that while it is called a “community garden,” it has been mostly run by one man, John Lindsay, since its inception. As Curtis Seward, who lives across the street from the plot, put it at the hearing, “John has done a herculean job keeping it up, but I don’t see any community in this so-called community garden.” That clearly resonated with Blackwell:  “I hear you loud and clear,” she said.
This would mean that the drugstore is verified by this reputed agency, which in turn, would serve as http://appalachianmagazine.com/2014/12/01/newly-published-civil-war-book-sheds-light-on-washington-society-during-war/ levitra purchase a guarantee of drug quality. The side effects of the medication are similar to those sildenafil tabs included in the written exam organized by the authorities. Healthy blood circulation helps a buy cialis online person achieving rock hard erections. Erectile dysfunction in young men is a statement that super viagra for sale seems far-fetched according to many people.

Wiota Street Garden delivers 1,000th pound of produce to food pantry (from garden’s Facebook page).

A report by Nicole Contosta published i n the University City Review  in January lauded the efforts made by the garden to forge new ties with the community, and to spread the news of all the good it does. The garden announced with fanfair in mid-December that it had just donated its 1,000th pound of produce for the year to a local food pantry. That followed a major honor earned by the garden in November. In its annual ranking of community gardens in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society gave the garden a Blue Ribbon Greening Award in the Urban Farms category. Contosta goes on to say:

“This represents only a fraction of the garden’s contribution to their West Powelton neighborhood and beyond. Recently, it sponsored a neighborhood clean-up at Barring and Wiota Streets. It added a library pick up and drop off box at its perimeter. Wiota Street Gardeners collected a huge quantity of leaves that they then blended into the garden’s soil last fall. Through the PHA, it has sponsored a winter garden contest to judge the condition of gardens in the off season. And gardeners took over the maintenance of the playground at Budd and Powelton Streets.”

Inga Saffron, the Philadelphia Inquirer‘s architecture critic, covered the Wiota Street garden in one of her Changing Skyline columns in October. For failing to make a decision, or answer questions about where she stands, Blackwell is the titular villain in Saffon’s piece, “Autocratic Leadership vs. Community Gardens. But she acknowledges that the “story is a bit more complex” than its backers suggest. To wit:

“There are some 400 community gardens in Philadelphia, a legacy of the long decades of decay and abandonment. The folks who stuck it out here laid claim to whatever vacant land they could, with little concern for the name on the deed. Officials were only too happy to see orderly rows of vegetables rather than have the earth swallow up the city.

“But that was then. Philadelphia is now undergoing a rowhouse boom the likes of which it hasn’t seen since immigrants were pouring off the docks in the early 20th century. As developers scramble for any available site where they can throw up a few houses, community gardens, lovingly tended for decades, have become easy targets. At least a half-dozen are under threat of being bulldozed, including one of the oldest, the Eastwick Community Garden.”

Good luck being one that is saved from legal limbo. Amy Laura Cahn, a lawyer who serves on the board of the The Neighborhood Gardens Trust tells Saffron that of the 318 gardens that have applied for legal status from the city’s landholding agencies, only 17 have had their standing clarified in the last two years.

A year ago, Lindsay reportedly saw the handwriting on the wall and suggested that the garden trust should assume formal control of the Wiota Street Garden to preserve it as green space, keeping it safe from developers. Saffron reported that the trust was “thrilled” by the suggeston. But in order for that tyo happen, ownership would need to be turned over to trust, which would move it off the Redevelopment Authority’s books and preserve it as green space. The Trust’s executive director, Jenny Greenberg, said at the meeting that the organization’s board has approved acquisition of the plot “contingent on broad access to the garden.”

Hearing Set on Land Bank’s Strategic Plan

The board of directors of the Philadelphia Land Bank Board, an entity charged with helping the city redevelop blighted properties, has released a draft of its latest Strategic Plan. The board will hold a public hearing on the plan on Thursday, Jan. 5, 2017, from 4 to 6 p.m. in the Planning Commission Hearing Room on the 18th floor at 1515 Arch Street.

More than 2,000 properties have been moved into the inventory of the Land Bank since it was established in 2013. It offers effective levitra 40 mg cure for impotence, erectile dysfunction and weak erection. cialis uk This position is important for a successful sexual intercourse to the satisfaction of both partners. You will be able to create more friction as well as contact in her genital passage and offer her memorable sexual pleasure through continuous pleasurable stroked for more than 5 minutes. generic uk viagra Besides this, also they impart you cheap online cialis prescriptions check out this link Kamagra Fizz with timely money off rates as well as extra health issues such as high cholesterol, high blood stress and diabetic issues. Last summer, the Land Bank for the first time began buying tax delinquent properties at tax foreclosure sales, and expects to add 350 more such properties to its inventory through the end of the current fiscal year.  That’s lots of land.  Urban ag should get some of it. The agency’s mission is to ensure “that acquisition and disposition actions support the need for affordable, workforce and market-rate rental and homeownership opportunities in Philadelphia as well as expand green space as side yards or community gardens and support commercial and economic development.”